Pharmacologic Differences of Sulfonylureas and the Risk of Adverse Cardiovascular and Hypoglycemic Events.

OBJECTIVE: Sulfonylureas have been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular adverse events and hypoglycemia, but it is unclear if these risks vary with different agents. We assessed whether the risks of acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality, and severe hypoglycemia differ between sulfonylureas grouped according to pancreas specificity and duration of action. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Using the U.K. Clinical Practice Research Datalink, linked with the Hospital Episodes Statistics and the Office for National Statistics databases, we conducted a cohort study among patients with type 2 diabetes initiating monotherapy with sulfonylureas between 1998 and 2013. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models, comparing use of pancreas-nonspecific, long-acting sulfonylureas (glyburide/glimepiride) to pancreas-specific, short-acting sulfonylureas (gliclazide/glipizide/tolbutamide). RESULTS: The cohort included 17,604 sulfonylurea initiators (mean [SD] follow-up 1.2 [1.5] years). Compared with specific, short-acting sulfonylureas (15,741 initiators), nonspecific, long-acting sulfonylureas (1,863 initiators) were not associated with an increased risk of acute myocardial infarction (HR 0.86; CI 0.55-1.34), ischemic stroke (HR 0.92; CI 0.59-1.45), cardiovascular death (HR 1.01; CI 0.72-1.40), or all-cause mortality (HR 0.81; CI 0.66-1.003), but with an increased risk of severe hypoglycemia (HR 2.83; CI 1.64-4.88). CONCLUSIONS: The nonspecific, long-acting sulfonylureas glyburide and glimepiride do not have an increased risk of cardiovascular adverse events compared with the specific, short-acting sulfonylureas gliclazide, glipizide, and tolbutamide. However, nonspecific, long-acting sulfonylureas glyburide and glimepiride have an increased risk of severe hypoglycemia.

HYPOGLYCEMIA INDUCED BY ANTIDIABETIC SULFONYLUREAS.

Diabetes mellitus is a major health problem due to its increasing prevalence and life-threatening complications. Antidiabetic sulfonylureas represent the first-line drugs in type 2 diabetes even though the most common associated risk is pharmacologically-induced hypoglycemia. In the development of this side effect are involved several factors including the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of the drug, patient age and behavior, hepatic or renal dysfunctions, or other drugs associated with a high risk of interactions. If all these are controlled, the risk-benefit balance can be equal to other oral antidiabetic drugs.

Studying significance of apoptosis in mediating tolbutamide-induced teratogenesis in vitro.

The incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus) is growing worldwide and poses a serious public health problem in a current paradigm of changing life style and food habits. Tolbutamide (sulfonylurea) is among the commonly used anti-diabetic drugs worldwide for treating type 2 diabetes and is known to cause congenital malformations in animals. In this study, the effect of tolbutamide on major organogenesis period and the possible involvement of apoptosis in mediating congenital malformations have been carried out. In the present study design, post-implantation rat embryos of day 11 were cultured for 24 h with various concentrations of tolbutamide, i.e., 10, 100, and 1000 µg/mL cultures, respectively. The growth and developmental of each embryo was evaluated and compared with control ones for the presence of any malformations. The tolbutamide decreased all growth and developmental parameters in a concentration-dependent manner, when compared with control. However, exposure to tolbutamide at 10 µg/mL culture did not show any significant effect on embryonic growth and development in vitro. In parallel to this, flow cytometric analysis (cell cycle and annexin V binding) and DNA fragmentation assay were carried out followed by quantitation by 3'-OH labeling of cultured rat embryos to examine the role of apoptosis in bringing about tolbutamide-induced teratogenesis. All results were found to be dose dependent and an increase in apoptosis in embryonic tissues may be related to the increased risk of congenital malformations. The outcome of the research suggested that apoptosis might be involved in mediating teratogenesis of tolbutamide in vitro. Further research is warranted to fully understand this mechanism.

Variations in tissue selectivity amongst insulin secretagogues: a systematic review.

AIM: Insulin secretagogues promote insulin release by binding to sulfonylurea receptors on pancreatic ß-cells (SUR1). However, these drugs also bind to receptor isoforms on cardiac myocytes (SUR2A) and vascular smooth muscle (SUR2B). Binding to SUR2A/SUR2B may inhibit ischaemic preconditioning, an endogenous protective mechanism enabling cardiac tissue to survive periods of ischaemia. This study was designed to identify insulin secretagogues that selectively bind to SUR1 when given at therapeutic doses. METHODS: Using accepted systematic review methods, three electronic databases were searched from inception to 13 June 2011. Original studies measuring the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) for an insulin secretagogue on K(ATP) channels using standard electrophysiological techniques were included. Steady-state concentrations (C(SS)) were estimated from the usual oral dose and clearance values for each drug. RESULTS: Data were extracted from 27 studies meeting all inclusion criteria. IC(50) values for SUR1 were below those for SUR2A/SUR2B for all insulin secretagogues and addition of C(SS) values identified three distinct patterns. The C(SS) for gliclazide, glipizide, mitiglinide and nateglinide lie between IC(50) values for SUR1 and SUR2A/SUR2B, suggesting that these drugs bind selectively to pancreatic receptors. The C(SS) for glimepiride and glyburide (glibenclamide) was above IC(50) values for all three isoforms, suggesting these drugs are non-selective. Tolbutamide and repaglinide may have partial pancreatic receptor selectivity because IC(50) values for SUR1 and SUR2A/SUR2B overlapped somewhat, with the C(SS) in the midst of these values. CONCLUSIONS: Insulin secretagogues display different tissue selectivity characteristics at therapeutic doses. This may translate into different levels of cardiovascular risk.

Comparable long-term mortality risk associated with individual sulfonylureas in diabetes patients with heart failure.

AIMS: The aim was to investigate the outcomes of individual sulfonylureas in patients with heart failure (HF). METHODS: All patients hospitalized with HF for the first time in 1997-2006, alive 30 days after discharge, and who received anti-diabetic monotherapy with glimepiride (n=1097), glibenclamide (glyburide) (n=1031), glipizide (n=557), gliclazide (n=251), or tolbutamide (n=541) were identified from nationwide registers. Risk of all-cause mortality was assessed by multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS: Over the median observational time of 744 (Inter Quartile Range 268-1451) days, 2242 patients (64%) died. The analysis demonstrated similar hazard ratio (HR) for mortality for treatment with glimepiride (1.10 [95% confidence interval 0.92-1.33]), glibenclamide (1.12 [0.93-1.34]), glipizide (1.14 [0.93-1.38]), tolbutamide (1.04 [0.85-1.26]), and gliclazide (reference). Grouped according to pancreatic specificity, i.e., with tolbutamide, glipizide, and gliclazide as specific, and glibenclamide, and glimepiride as non-specific agents, no differential prognosis was found between the two groups (HR 1.04 [0.96-1.14], for non-specific, compared to pancreas specific agents). The prognosis was not dependent on prior acute myocardial infarction or ischemic heart disease (p for interactions >0.3). CONCLUSIONS: In current clinical practice, it is unlikely that there are considerable differences in risk of mortality associated with individual sulfonylureas in patients with heart failure.

The UGDP controversy: thirty-four years of contentious ambiguity laid to rest.

The University Group Diabetes Program (UGDP), launched in 1960, was an early placebo-controlled, multi-center clinical trial devised to determine which, if any, of the treatments for type 2 diabetes was efficacious. Because of an excess of cardiac deaths in patients treated with tolbutamide, a sulfonylurea drug, investigators terminated this limb of the study. This decision was met with strong resistance from the parent drug company and many in the medical community. Subsequent clinical studies both supported and conflicted with the UDGP findings, so that the controversy has persisted. A rationale for sulfonylurea-induced cardiotoxicity emerged with the observation that these drugs block ischemic preconditioning, a protective maneuver that reduces myocardial damage after temporary blockage of coronary blood flow; this action of sulfonylureas provided laboratory support for the UGDP findings. The development of newer sulfonylurea drugs that do not block ischemic preconditioning has rendered the UGDP controversy moot and has preserved a place for sulfonylureas in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Is impairment of ischaemic preconditioning by sulfonylurea drugs clinically important?

In the UGDP study, published in the 1970s, a high incidence of cardiovascular mortality was found in patients treated with the sulfonylurea agent tolbutamide. Impaired ischaemic preconditioning is presumed to be the most important mechanism for the excess cardiovascular mortality observed. However, as tolbutamide has only a low affinity for cardiac sulfonylurea receptors, interference with ischaemic preconditioning seems unlikely to account for this excess mortality. Several smaller studies also failed to establish a definite link between sulfonylurea treatment before acute myocardial infarction and in-hospital mortality. However, when the myocardium becomes exposed to repeated or prolonged periods of ischaemia, ischaemic preconditioning may become clinically important. Myocardial ischaemia can also develop during emergency or elective angioplasty and during coronary bypass surgery. Therefore discontinuation of sulfonylurea treatment should be considered in these circumstances.

Likelihood methods for measuring statistical evidence.

Focused on interpreting data as statistical evidence, the evidential paradigm uses likelihood ratios to measure the strength of statistical evidence. Under this paradigm, re-examination of accumulating evidence is encouraged because (i) the likelihood ratio, unlike a p-value, is unaffected by the number of examinations and (ii) the probability of observing strong misleading evidence is naturally low, even for study designs that re-examine the data with each new observation. Further, the controllable probabilities of observing misleading and weak evidence provide assurance that the study design is reliable without affecting the strength of statistical evidence in the data. This paper illustrates the ideas and methods associated with using likelihood ratios to measure statistical evidence. It contains a comprehensive introduction to the evidential paradigm, including an overview of how to quantify the probability of observing misleading evidence for various study designs. The University Group Diabetes Program (UGDP), a classic and still controversial multi-centred clinical trial, is used as an illustrative example. Some of the original UGDP results, and subsequent re-analyses, are presented for comparison purposes.

[Development of simplified and rapid detection assay for genetic polymorphisms influencing drug response and its clinical applications].

Clinically important genetic polymorphisms influencing drug metabolism and drug response have typically been discovered on the basis of phenotypic differences among individuals from different populations. Routine genotyping before drug therapy may enable the identification of responders, nonresponders, or patients at increased risk of toxicity. Automated, high-throughput detecting methods for single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are highly desirable in many clinical laboratories. The aim of this study is to develop a high-throughput genotyping method for detecting SNPs influencing drug response in the Japanese population. We have developed three real-time PCR assays for detecting SNPs in the human drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug targets. The assay for simultaneously detecting CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C18, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, CYP3A5, NAT2, TPMT, DPYD, UGT1A1, ALDH2, ADH2, MDR1, CETP, DCP-1, ADRB2, HTR2A, INPP1, SDF1, and mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms takes less than 1.5 h. With the clinical application of NAT2 genotyping, we found statistically significant difference between the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and the NAT2 genotype. The incidence of the ADRs was significantly higher in the slow type than the in other two types, as 5 of the 6 patients were of the slowtype, and the other was the intermediatetype, while no patients of the rapidtype has developed any ADRs.

Comparison of capillary electrophoresis with HPLC for diagnosis of factitious hypoglycemia.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of "factitious hypoglycemia" is essentially based on the disclosure of hypoglycemic agents in blood or urine. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of capillary electrophoresis (CE) as a quantitative method for determination of chlorpropamide, tolbutamide, glipizide, gliclazide, and glibenclamide in serum. METHODS: Serum samples (1 mL), with internal standard added, were purified by solid-phase extraction on OASIS(TM) HLB cartridges (Waters), dried under reduced pressure, and reconstituted with 30-60 microL of acetonitrile:H(2)O. Analysis was carried out by micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography in 5 mmol/L borate, 5 mmol/L phosphate, 75 mmol/L sodium cholate, pH 8.5, containing 25 mL/L methanol. Separation was accomplished in a 20 cm x 50 microm (i.d.) silica capillary at 25 degrees C and a constant voltage of +10 kV. Pharmacokinetics of gliclazide (80-mg tablet) in a diabetic patient were assayed by both HPLC and CE. Two hypoglycemic patients positive by HPLC analysis for unreported gliclazide and tolbutamide overdose were also screened by CE. RESULTS: Separation of six drugs (including the internal standard) was accomplished in 5 min plus 5 min rinsing. The between-day CV of the ratio of the areas of the sulfonylurea drugs to internal standard was <1% (n = 10). Linearity (r(2) > or =0.998) and recovery (> or =80%) were good for all sulfonylurea drugs tested. Pharmacokinetic curves for gliclazide by CE and HPLC were superimposable. CE analysis confirmed the HPLC diagnosis of surreptitious abuse of gliclazide and tolbutamide. CONCLUSION: CE is a useful tool in the clinical chemistry and toxicology laboratory for drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic investigations.

Prolonged elimination of tolbutamide in a premature newborn with hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia.

So far, gestational diabetes treated with tolbutamide has never been associated with severe hypoglycaemia in the newborn when the mother's diabetes was well controlled. We report a case of a premature neonate, gestational age 34 weeks, with severe and long-standing hypoglycaemia from birth. The mother had well-controlled gestational diabetes, treated with tolbutamide from the 24th week of gestation until delivery. The neonate had inappropriately high levels of serum proinsulin, insulin and C-peptide relative to blood glucose concentrations. From day 19 after birth, the levels were normalized. Serum tolbutamide was 140.6 micromol/l (38 microg/ml) at 3 h after birth. Zero-order kinetics were seen during the first 90 postnatal hours. The half-life of serum tolbutamide decreased from 46 to 6 h. It is suggested that tolbutamide, when given to the mother until delivery, may cause severe and prolonged hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia in premature neonates. The initially prolonged tolbutamide half-lives and zero-order kinetics suggest immaturity of hepatic elimination during the first 2 days of postnatal life.

Anti-diabetic drugs as a cause of hypoglycaemia among acute medical admissions in Hong Kong and Singapore--relationship to the prescribing patterns in diabetic patients.

Severe hypoglycaemia due to anti-diabetic drugs is a more important cause of medical admissions in Hong Kong (1.5%) than in Singapore (0.4%-0.8%), although the prevalence and pattern of diabetes mellitus in the two Chinese populations are similar. Review of the available drug utilisation data indicated that glibenclamide and tolbutamide are the most frequently used sulphonylurea in Hong Kong and Singapore, respectively. These drugs also predominate among diabetic patients admitted with hypoglycaemia in the respective population. Since the risk of hypoglycaemia is greater for glibenclamide than other sulphonylureas, the increased incidence of anti-diabetic drug-induced hypoglycaemia in Hong Kong may, at least in part, be related to the frequent use of glibenclamide.

Rates of hypoglycemia in users of sulfonylureas.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the demographic and clinical characteristics of sulfonylurea users. To assess the risk of hypoglycemia in patients treated with sulfonylureas in clinical practice, and to characterize the risk in relation to the different drugs used. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A cohort of 33,243 sulfonylurea users chosen from 719 clinical practices in the United Kingdom were identified through the VAMP-Research database. Information on demographic characteristics, medical diagnoses and use of medical services was obtained through the computerized records. For a stratified sample of 500 patients, general practioners completed a structured questionnaire on the duration, treatment, and complications of diabetes mellitus, obesity, alcohol use, and smoking history. Patients with a diagnosis of hypoglycemia, as recorded in the database within a time-window of a sulfonylurea prescription, were identified. Incidence rates per person-year of sulfonylurea therapy were estimated. RESULTS: Other than a longer duration of diabetes in users of chlorpropamide, no differences were observed among users of different sulfonylurea agents with respect to diabetic complications, adequacy of diabetic control, obesity, smoking, and excessive alcohol consumption. A diagnosis of hypoglycemia during sulfonylurea therapy was recorded in 605 people over 34,052 person-years of sulfonylurea therapy, which converted into an annual risk of 1.8%. The risk in glibenclamide users was higher than in users of other types of sulfonylureas uses. Duration of therapy, concomitant use of insulin, sulfonylurea-potentiating or antagonizing and concomitant use of beta-blockers were predictive of the risk of developing hypoglycemia. DISCUSSION: Drug use patterns showed comparability among users of different sulfonylurea agents. Our findings suggest that the rate of diagnosis of hypoglycemia made by physicians is higher for glibenclamide than for other sulfonylureas. An epidemiological study with objectively diagnosed hypoglycemia should be undertaken to confirm these results.

Phototoxicity to sulphonamide-derived oral antidiabetics and diuretics: investigations in hairless mice.

The oral antidiabetics glibenclamide, glipizide, glymidine, tolazamide and tolbutamide and the diuretics bemetizide, bendroflumethiazide, benzylhydrochlorothiazide, bumetanide, butizide, furosemide, hydrochlorothiazide, hydroflumethiazide and trichlormethiazide were investigated for phototoxic effects in hairless mice. The back of the animals (hr/hr-c3H/TifBom) was covered with Duoderm dressing, and at the site of two punched out holes 0.05 ml of the test substances at 0.25 mol/l concentration and the solvent alone as control were injected intradermally, respectively. Both test and control sites were irradiated with 6-12 J/cm2 of longwave UVA light from a "Bluelight 2000" apparatus (Hönle, Martinsried, Germany). Skin reactions were read at 24 and 48 h. Compared to the solvent alone, all of the test substances induced reactions (necrosis or oedema)--most frequently seen by macroscopic and histologic investigation and by measurements with a thickness gage. Injection of the test substance or solvent alone without or with subsequent UVA irradiation, as well as UVA alone, did not induce measurable skin changes in this model. Three oral antidiabetics and four diuretics, not yet described to induce photosensitivity in vitro nor in vivo, were detected as potential photosensitizers using our animal model.

Photohemolytic potency of oral antidiabetic drugs in vitro: effects of antioxidants and a nitrogen atmosphere.

The sulphonamide-derived oral antidiabetic drugs carbutamide, chlorpropamide, glibenclamide, glibornuride, gliclazide, glipizide, gliquidone, glisoxepide, glymidine, tolazamide and tolbutamide were investigated for photohemolytic properties in vitro. Irradiation with a SOL 3 apparatus (solar simulating irradiation) revealed hemolysis in the presence of chlorpropamide, glipizide, gliquidone, glymidine and tolbutamide (all in the concentration 10(-3) mol/l). Except for glymidine, which exerted photohemolysis in the concentration 10(-4) mol/l, no hemolytic effects were seen in the concentration of 10(-4) mol/l or 10(-5) mol/l. Irradiation with TL 12 light bulbs (UVB), a UVASUN 5000 apparatus (UVA) or an experimental lamp (visible light) did not induce phototoxic hemolysis with either of the test substances. Addition of the antioxidants ascorbic acid, alpha-tocopherol or superoxide dismutase significantly inhibited the phototoxic hemolysis. Investigations carried out in a nitrogen-rich atmosphere reduced the hemolysis as well. These findings indicate an involvement of reactive oxygen species in the mechanism of action of the hemolytic process in the presence of oral antidiabetic drugs.

Similar physiological and symptomatic responses to sulphonylurea and insulin induced hypoglycaemia in normal subjects.

There is little information concerning the physiological response to hypoglycaemia induced by sulphonylureas. We compared the physiological and symptomatic responses to insulin and tolbutamide induced hypoglycaemia in 8 normal subjects. While infusing either insulin or tolbutamide, we used a glucose clamp to maintain blood glucose at 4.5 mmol l-1 for 30 min and lowered it to 2.9 mmol l-1 for a further 30 min. Mean peripheral insulin levels during the insulin infusion arm in comparison with the tolbutamide infusion were not significantly different during the euglycaemic plateau: 106 +/- 4 vs 77 +/- 15 mU l-1 (mean +/- SEM) (mean difference 29 mU l-1, 95% CI -22 to 80; p = NS) but were greater during the hypoglycaemic plateau: 106 +/- 3.5 vs 21.0 +/- 4.0 mU l-1 (mean difference 85 mU l-1, 95% CI 72 to 98; p < 0.0001). Portal insulin concentrations, calculated from C-peptide data were not significantly different during the euglycaemic plateau with insulin as compared to tolbutamide. However, during hypoglycaemia portal insulin concentrations were significantly higher 15 min from the start of the plateau, during insulin infusion. During hypoglycaemia induced by either insulin or tolbutamide there were similar peak responses of glucagon: 124 +/- 14 vs 128 +/- 7 ng l-1 (mean difference -4, 95% CI -39 to 31; p = NS) and adrenaline: 2.9 +/- 0.4 vs 2.8 +/- 0.3 nmol l-1, (mean difference 0.1, 95% CI -0.9 to 1.0; p = NS). Increases in tremor and sweating and deterioration in reaction time were similar during both periods of hypoglycaemia as were increases in total: 18.5 +/- 1.4 vs 19.6 +/- 2.2 (mean difference -1.0, 95% CI -3.8 to 1.8; p = NS) and autonomic: 8.9 +/- 0.9 vs. 9.9 +/- 1.3 (mean difference -1.1, 95% CI -5.9 to 3.6; p = NS) symptom scores. We conclude that there is no difference in the glucagon, sympathoadrenal, cognitive or symptomatic response during hypoglycaemia induced by either insulin or tolbutamide. This suggests that the different insulin concentrations produced by these contrasting models of hypoglycaemia had no effect on the physiological response and patients taking sulphonylureas can be expected to develop similar warning symptoms to those on insulin.

Multicenter, placebo-controlled trial comparing acarbose (BAY g 5421) with placebo, tolbutamide, and tolbutamide-plus-acarbose in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Acarbose delays release of glucose from complex carbohydrates and disaccharides by inhibiting intestinal alpha-glucosidases, thereby attenuating postprandial increments in blood glucose and insulin. This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared the efficacy and safety of diet alone, acarbose, tolbutamide, and acarbose-plus-tolbutamide in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 290 patients with NIDDM and fasting plasma glucose levels of at least 140 mg/dL were randomized to receive treatment TID with acarbose 200 mg, tolbutamide 250 to 1,000 mg, a combination of both drugs, or placebo. A 6-week run-in period was followed by double-blind treatment for 24 weeks, then a 6-week follow-up period. RESULTS: All active treatments were superior (P < 0.05) to placebo in reducing postprandial hyperglycemia and HbA1c levels. The ranking in order of efficacy was: acarbose-plus-tolbutamide, tolbutamide, acarbose, and placebo. The postprandial reductions in glucose were approximately 85 mg/dL for acarbose-plus-tolbutamide, 71 mg/dL for tolbutamide, 56 mg/dL for acarbose, and 13 mg/dL for placebo. Tolbutamide was associated with increases in body weight and postprandial insulin levels when taken alone, but these were ameliorated when tolbutamide was taken in combination with acarbose. Acarbose alone or in combination with tolbutamide caused significantly more gastrointestinal adverse events (mainly flatulence and soft stools or diarrhea) than tolbutamide or placebo, but these were generally well tolerated. Clinically significant elevations in hepatic transaminase levels occurred in 3 patients in the acarbose group and 2 in the acarbose-plus-tolbutamide group. Transaminase levels returned to normal when therapy was discontinued. CONCLUSIONS: Acarbose was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of NIDDM. Control of glycemia was significantly better with acarbose compared with diet alone. Acarbose-plus-tolbutamide was superior to tolbutamide alone.